Friday, July 9, 2010

Friday Odds and Ends


Even though I was gone for a while visiting my family, I discovered I was also still out and about on the web. Barbara Vey of Publishers Weekly gave STROKE OF GENIUS a delightful push on her blog Beyond Her Book . If you haven't bookmarked this blog, I encourage you to do so. Barb always has something fresh to share. Here are some highlights from the blog:


"Emily Bryan does it again. Stroke of Genius sparkles and crackles with whip sharp dialog and characters to cheer for. Historicals have never been such fun."


RomCon begins today in Denver. I sincerely wish I could make this conference, but I'm 10 pages behind in my current WIP and can't spare the time away. My novella in A CHRISTMAS BALL, My Lady Below Stairs is up for their prestigious Reader's Crown Award. Just being nominated is an incredible honor, especially since the rest of the field in my category includes talent like Jade Lee, Erin McCarthy, Sophia Nash and Courtney Milan.

I was blogging at the RomCon site yesterday and will be giving away a signed copy of STROKE OF GENIUS to a commenter. I'm not sure when the site will close the contest, so please pop over right away and let me know you were there.

I'd like to wish you all a belated Happy 4th of July. It's my dad's birthday and we had a grand time celebrating it with him. This snarky little pic is my oldest daughter, making fun of the fact that I used to make her and her her sister wear oven mitts to do sparklers when they were little. You may laugh, but I got them both to majority with all their fingers intact!

Hope you're having a wonderful summer filled with "take me away" beach reads. I'm just starting Sabrina Jeffries' THE TRUTH ABOUT LORD STONEVILLE.

What's on your bedside table?

Thursday, July 8, 2010

Disclaimer: ASPCA Friendly Blog


PLEASE NOTE! NO ACTUAL KITTENS WERE KILLED AS A RESULT OF THIS WEEK'S RED PENCIL THURSDAY POST!
Only virtual kittens are harmed by the dreaded exclamation point! (Please read the RPT comments for further explanation.)

Red Pencil Thursday with Barbara Huddleston

One of the lovely things about having lived in lots of places is that I know writers from all over. I first met Barbara Huddleston (who intends to write as Barbara Bettis) when I lived in Missouri. I used to drive 100 miles to attend the Ozark Romance Authors meetings in Springfield once a month and Barb is a very talented member of that group. I was so impressed by her writing the first time I heard her read during the group critique time, when she volunteered for Red Pencil Thursday, I knew we'd all be in for a treat!

As always, my comments are in red. Barbara's are purple. Please add yours in the comment section!

Chapter 1
Normandy
Love this unusual setting. I forgot to ask. Is this a historical romance or straight historical? Since medievals are experiencing a bit of a resurgence, this setting is still commercially viable.
It’s a romance. Sigh. ;-) The action will switch to England very soon, though.
Even better. England is still the--pardon the pun--"Queen Mother" of settings for historical romance.
Mid-March 1199


Damn, he hated the silence.

Starting with a twist is a good way to pique our interest. Normally people find silence restful, relaxing. The fact that your hero doesn't speaks volumes about him and his situation.

Sir Steven of Riverton held his breath. Drops of perspiration swept down his neck despite the cool night. He listened for the rustle of leaves, the yip of fox kit, the whirsh of owl wings. Nothing. Even the breeze scarcely stroked his beard-stubbed cheek as he led his bay gelding, Jasper. Step by step they eased through the tiny clearing. Sluggish light from the quarter moon cast a watery path ahead.

Brilliant beginning. You've used tactile and auditory clues to set your scene instead of just visual. Is whirsh a real word or did you invent it? Either way, I know exactly what you mean. Even the last sentence which uses visual description does so in an original way. I've never seen 'sluggish light' or a 'watery path' anywhere else. This is fresh writing and I wish I'd done it!

I did make up ‘whirsh.’ (Thank you!)

One query about your hero's name. Steven spelled that way seems more modern to me than Stephen. Did you research the name to make sure that spelling was common in the 12th century?

Absolutely right. It’s now Stephen. ;-)

Also, I'm not sure I need the name of the horse yet. I'd really like to zero in on just your hero. The horse is a prop at this point.

Humm. I never thought about the horse’s name. It is kind of wonky for the 1100s--and I did think I needed to name it right away. But I’ll go back and work w/ the wording to take it out. Your comment here ties in with one you made on an earlier RP entry about focusing on the hero’s name in the opening, and how we’re just getting to know him (or whomever we’re opening with). Best not to bring in too many other names all at once.

When he left the village earlier, his decision to avoid travelers and return through the woods seemed unnecessary. Few knew of this meeting. What need for subterfuge? Still, routine propelled him off the familiar road between village and monastery. Now, as he pushed on, the very silence shouted.

Danger.

Thank you for not succumbing to the temptation to use an ! here. According to Heather Osborn (editor for Tor/Forge) "Every time you use an !, you kill a kitten." Barbara has used an embedded hook here (if you followed my online MY HUSBAND MARRIED A HOOKER workshop, you already know a hook is a tantalyzing bit of information that draws the reader in and propels them forward.) She's let us know Sir Steven is up to something secretive and dangerous without giving away too much.

He inhaled, soft, easy. A trace of rancid sweat hit his nostrils. Jesu! On the right. He ducked the instant a knife blade nicked his ear. Instinct drove his own double-edged dagger down then up through cloth and flesh. He wrenched the blade free. Warm, copper-scented wetness pulsed across his arm.

It seems I'm only cataloguing all the things you're doing right. Using scents and tactile impressions along with short "stream of consciousness" phrases pulls us into tight POV. We're experiencing everything at the same time Steven experiences it. This is how it's done, kids.

A word about curses. It's so important that they be appropriate to the character and the time period in order to lend a ring of authenticity. Sir Steven would be a Christian and during this century, he'd think of his Savior by his Latin name. Well done.

Not his blood, thank God. And he damn well better move if he wanted to keep it that way. Reins fisted, Steven leaped into the saddle just as keening whoops slashed the air. The rest of the pack. His mind marked the voices—too many. He couldn’t fight them all. Four, six, more shadows burst into the clearing—front, sides, back. He knew the drill. Draw the circle tighter. Trap the target.

I love the way you use language in original ways. The idea of a sound slashing the air is vibrantly new to me. Notice how as the action speeds up, Barbara's sentences get shorter. This gives the passage a sense of urgency.

He made those rules. He could damn well break them. The circle rotated. Strongest always in front to block escape. Bent low over his mount’s neck, he yanked sharply left, always the weak side of the pattern.

By letting us in on his analysis of the situation, you've deftly shown us he's a military man without telling us so.

He kicked out as he galloped past a shadow. It went down. The well-trained Jasper leaped through the opening. Then a sting on his left sent fire up Steven’s leg. He reached down, jerked free the knife, jammed a fist against his thigh. This time the thick wetness oozing through his fingers was his own.

It's been a while since you used his horse's name. I was a little distracted by it. I wonder if you might wait until they are out of danger to even introduce the animal's name. Steven's the important one here. Let us focus on him.

Will do.

The suck of breath rang in his ears, drowned his pounding heart. No sound of pursuit yet, but that would change. There…the thud of hooves echoed, far enough behind to give him time. Into the forest he headed. The thunder grew closer, loud enough to drown his brief stop to bound from the saddle.

Into the forest he headed is passive sentence structure. Your hero's not the least bit passive. I'd rather see He headed into the forest.

You’re absolutely right. The reason I wrote it that way was…I was afraid of having too many subject/verb constructions that people would think was too choppy. So I tossed that wording into the stream. Guess I’d better fish it out.

“Satan’s backside.” His bloodied leg buckled as he hit the ground rolling. Jasper picked up the gait and crashed through the underbrush onto a narrow path.

Another historically accurate curse, but I wonder if he'd use a two worded one here. Seems a tad long for the action. Perhaps a scatological remark would be more appropriate in these circumstances.

Point taken. I really need to find some different curses that would be “medieval appropriate.” I find myself using the same ones a lot. Or making them up--which doesn’t always work. OH!! I just thought of one. Merde! That would work here.

Perfect! You can't get much more scatological than "Merde!" As far as other curses go, God's Wounds, God's Feet, pretty much God's anything was used as an oath.

Steven hurtled into a large bush, ducked beneath the thick branches. And gritted his teeth when brambles clawed his cheeks.

Christ in chains. Can this night get any better?

Every publishing house has their own style rules but since this is Steven's direct thought, I'd want it italicized. To indicate that for both Dorchester and Kensington, underline the text to be italicized.

THANK YOU. Some of us have had this conversation so often. We didn’t know whether to italicize it in the text as we write or to underline it. Now we know.

The reason they use underlines is because it's hard to see italics in Courier New.

Earth vibrated as the others pounded past. Who were these assailants? Not Assassins. Too much noise. Subtle conniving marked Assassins. He could think of only one explanation. The murdering knights he hunted. Did they know his identity, or had they tracked The Black Dagger only?

Excellent hooks to set up the conflict for your hero. Now we know there are a couple dangerous groups who might want him dead.

Your crisp, elegant prose speaks to me. I really didn't want this excerpt to end. When this one sells, I'll be at the bookstore on its release day with my wallet open!

Thank you for the things you pointed out, Emily. I appreciate your help so much. One thing I was worried about in this beginning--it continues along this line for another couple of pages--is that it has no dialogue. I feared having a narrative opening would be highly frowned on? And thank you for your very kind words. As the saying goes, “From your mouth to God’s ear”…and an agent’s…and an editor’s…. ;-)

I wasn't troubled by the lack of dialogue because there's so much action. Now, if it goes on too much longer, I might be bothered by it, but your POV is so good and tight, we know exactly what Stephen's thinking. I have more problems with openings that are merely the character engaging in internal dialogue, mulling over past events. We hear snippets of Stephen's thoughts, but mostly we're right there with him in the thick of things. Well done!

Barb’s bio:
A former journalist and journalism professor, Barb now teaches English at a local college and devotes every spare moment to spinning stories about ladies and their knights in shining armor--because she firmly believes everyone needs a hero. She lives in Missouri.

Ok, now it's your turn to comment. Any suggestions for how Barb can make her story better?

PS.Today I'm over at the RomCon site blogging about favorite TV shows and movies and how they dovetail with book characters. I'm also giving away copy of Stroke of Genius to one lucky commenter. Please come over and let me know you were there.

In case you're unfamiliar with RomCon, this is the new Romance Conference sponsored by Borders Books. You'll need to register (it's FREE!) in order to leave a comment, but the site is very interactive and fun.
Hope to see you there!

Wednesday, July 7, 2010

Revamping my Online Presence

After much websurfing, I've settled on Wax Creative to design my new Mia Marlowe website. (In case you missed the memo, I'll be writing under this new pen name starting next May with the release of TOUCH OF A THIEF from Kensington Brava). I'm sharing about the experience on my Mia Marlowe blog. Since I'm still in the planning stages, I'd appreciate your input about what you like to see on an author's website. So please pop over to my Mia blog and add your two cents.

Tuesday, July 6, 2010

Do We Need to Like the Heroine?

When I read a romance, I want to love the hero. But is it also important to like the heroine? After all, I'm walking in her shoes as I read. Shouldn't I at least admire and secretly want to be her, if for only the duration of the book?

Evidently not.

I haven't seen the most recent Twilight movie, but I've read all the books and frankly, Bella is a puzzlement to me. She behaves in a heroic way in the first book, sacrificing herself when she thinks her mother is in danger, but after that shining moment she went downhill fast. She's whiny and manipulative. She strings Jacob along shamelessly, keeping him dangling as a second fiddle in case things don't work out with Edward. She engages in dangerous behavior just to get attention. She throws a tantrum because Edward guards her purity (and his own!) before they marry.

I just can't find much to like about her and I'm having a hard time understanding why these two fine young men are so enamored of her.

I'm in awe of the success of this franchise. Stephenie Meyer is an amazing writer and any author who says she hasn't smacked her own forehead and exclaimed "Dang! I wish I'd thought of vegetarian vampires!" is only kidding herself.

But I still really don't get Bella.

Can anyone enlighten me?

Home Again

And Dorothy was right. There's no place like it.

I had a lovely visit with family in the midwest, but I'm ready to be back in the writing harness again.

Thanks to all of you who made Christine Donovan welcome for Red Pencil Thursday in my absence!

Thursday, July 1, 2010

Red Pencil Thursday with Christine Donovan

I'm still in Missouri, but it's Red Pencil Thursday anyway! Please welcome Christine Donovan to our online critique. Unforutnately because I'm traveling, I don't have access to one of my email accounts, so I don't have Christine's responses to my comments which are in red. I hope she'd add her thoughts in the comment section along with all the rest of you.



"The Reluctant Duke"
Good title! Reminds me of The Reluctant Dragon, a story I loved as a child.

London 1817

Chapter One

"It appears, Your Grace, you have bested me and left me destitute."
Your opener raises questions in the readers mind. That's how to begin!

Demetrius Seabrook the Duke of Magnus met the eyes of Mr. Hamilton, known as the New Bedford Whaling Tycoon and could not shake off the prickling sensation on the back of his neck. The transplanted Englander amassed his fortune in the Americans during the past twenty years and looked anything but upset at his loss. And it was a fortune indeed. Magnus could not even begin to contemplate his luck. Deep down, however, intuition warned him to proceed with caution.

I like your hero's name, but not his title. Magnus doesn't sound like a place name and dukes are always the Duke of Someplace. I'm not wild about the sentence that introduces him either. There's too much info in too short a space. I advise splitting it up and simplifying. How about . . .

Demetrius Seabrook, Duke of Magnus could not shake off the prickles on the back of his neck. Mr. Hamilton looked anything but upset at his loss.



We don't need to know about how Mr. Hamilton made his fortune or what he's known as right here. For later reference, he would consider himself an Englishman not an Englander. You're introducing your hero. Let's stay focused on the duke.



"Mr. Hamilton, how is it you came to be here today?" Magnus leaned back in his chair and forced his blasé attitude. He spoke calm and direct not wanting to mince words. "I've never had the pleasure of your company before. Nor have I heard rumor of your passion for the gaming tables. I do believe sir you were in over your head and because of this I will take the monies you lost, at least what is on the table, but I must pass on the rest."

I'm unsure what you're trying to convey with "forced his blase attitude." I'd cut the "He spoke" sentence entirely. It doesn't add anything to the exchange. You need a comma before and after the word 'sir'

Gasps and murmurs surrounded the men at Whites. Magnus ignored it. How could he in good conscience take everything this man had? True, he was desperate for coin himself, thanks to his late father, the previous Duke, but he would not profit at the expense of another. He had seen too many gentlemen of the ton lose everything in the gambling halls. Their self-respect, properties and fortunes lost in a shuffle of a card or the roll of bones. It led to disgrace and sometimes worse. He would not be responsible for this particular gentleman's fall. Could not subject this man's family to what still haunted him on a daily basis.

There's a bit of a logic problem here. If he wouldn't profit from another's loss, why is Magnus gambling? I'm sensing that his father lost their fortune gaming. If that's the case, it might be more logical for Magnus to abstain from betting. Gamblers had a very strict code. A gentleman honored his debts, no matter if they ruined him. By refusing to accept his winnings, Magnus is insulting the other man.


And in a strictly writing sense, this paragraph is a little "tell-y." Especially at the opening of a story, you're better of showing. It's stronger to show what the hero does without going into why at this point.

Two of his closest friends stood behind him, Edward Amesbury Duke of Norwich leaned down and spoke quietly into his ear. "Magnus, do you realize what you are passing up? Here is your chance to regain your fortune, restore your holdings and lands."



Because they offer him advice, we can infer they are his close friends without being told. Cut "Two of his closest friends stood behind him." Reading is a conversation with the author. Let the reader pull a little of the load by letting them fill in logical holes. I don't believe it's possible for the duke to have lost his land. Law even prohibited land attached to a title from being sold. However, I'll believe he's strapped and cash-poor.



Myles Fredrickson the heir to the Earl of Northborough bent down and added his two pence worth. "Have you forgotten your sisters' dowries or your brother's commission?"

He had not forgotten anything. How could he? Yet the tingling that had begun on his neck now spread down his back. He never ignored his intuition. Mr. Hamilton appeared calm, too calm for someone who just gambled away all he had in the world. He could have sworn the man grinned when he lost and when Magnus refused to take his holdings he had scowled. What sort of man did that? No self-respecting gentleman he knew of.



I understand that Hamilton is trying to trick him, but the way you've described it is a bit too "on the nose." If the clues are more subtle, we'll find the duke more attractively intelligent. It doesn't take intuition to read the facial expressions you've described here. Instead of a grin, perhaps a quirk of his lips. Instead of a scowl, a slight deepening of the frown line between his brows.



And on the contrary, a self-respecting gentleman would insist on the payment of his gambling debts being accepted. At least publicly.



Charles Hamilton's heart throbbed against his chest when he finally lost everything to the Duke. One would think it would be easy to lose at cards. It was not because it went against every ingrained instinct one possessed. It had not been easy to throw all the hands. He had planned well though.



Oops! Major head hop. I know Nora does it, but we are not Nora. I advise new writers to do as I do. Limit yourself to one head per scene, unless the POV character leaves the scene. I sometimes transition into a different POV character that way. The smooth way to switch POV mid-scene is to have one paragraph of ambiguous, "omniscient" POV between heads.



But here at the beginning of your story you want us to fall in love or at least be intrigued by your hero. To do that, we need to stick with him. At least until this scene ends.



BTW, duke is not capitalized unless you're using it as part of his title. The duke, the king, the queen--none of them are capitalized unless it's the Duke of Wellington, King Louis, or Queen Latifah.



Thanks for letting me take a look at your Reluctant Duke, Christine. I love that he's a decent fellow who hasn't let his own misfortune make him less sympathetic to others. A very good heroic quality.



(Bio) My name is Christine Donovan I write Regency, Contemporary and Paranormal Romance. I started writing eight years ago and have nine completed manuscripts waiting for a home. I live in Southeastern Mass. with my husband, four sons and two cats. Visit me on Facebook under Christine Murray Donovan.


Ok, everybody! Now it's your turn. Please help Christine out and be sure to give her a few "atta, girls" too. The best critique finds the positives as well as the weaknesses, IMO and there are plenty of good things here.